Qortal Project

The future of blockchain platforms

User Tools

Site Tools


sponsorship_system_changes

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
sponsorship_system_changes [05/30/2021 13:29] gfactorsponsorship_system_changes [05/30/2021 13:34] gfactor
Line 19: Line 19:
 **The above are FACTS without any opinion convoluting them. Here are now the concluding thoughts by G Factor:** **The above are FACTS without any opinion convoluting them. Here are now the concluding thoughts by G Factor:**
  
-The argument is often made that good people will outpace the bad with such issue. Greedy people will always be greedy people. So in reality, there will always be a way to game this honor system and ultimately will lead to a situation where block rewards are so minimal that the incentive for the good and bad to run nodes for the purpose to mint compared to genuinely supporting the network will begin to burn out. And with a slow minting production schedule and respect to the ever-increasing demand/applicability of QORT within the system, the value of QORT will rise and shouldn’t be an issue. With that said, what changes could be implemented to help combat such bad acting? One account per node can actually be gamed by those technically inclined. We will never have KYC as we respect anonymity. We could see about a more complex system that regularly requires authentication in some form. What are your thoughts?+The argument is often made that good people will outpace the bad with this issue. Greedy people will always be greedy people. So in reality, there will always be a way to game this honor system and ultimately will lead to a situation where block rewards are so minimal that the incentive for the good and bad to run nodes for the purpose to mint compared to genuinely supporting the network will begin to burn out. And with a slow minting production schedule and respect to the ever-increasing demand/applicability of QORT within the system, the value of QORT will rise and shouldn’t be an issue. With that said, what changes could be implemented to help combat such bad acting? One account per node can actually be gamed by those technically inclined. We will never have KYC as we respect anonymity. We could see about a more complex system that regularly requires authentication in some form. What are your thoughts? Remember, votes will never be held for anything more than for the Dev Team to gauge the community’s interest in certain directions the Dev Team can go such as time spent implementing coin, modifying sponsorship system, block reward, etc. 
  
 **Join us in the ‘Voting System’ channel in Discord for this discussion.** **Join us in the ‘Voting System’ channel in Discord for this discussion.**