Qortal Project

The future of blockchain platforms

User Tools

Site Tools

Trace:
qora_original_data_hosting_model

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Next revision		Previous revision
qora_original_data_hosting_model [08/16/2021 15:21] – created gfactorqora_original_data_hosting_model [11/02/2023 14:18] (current) – [THIS IS NOT THE MODEL QORTAL USES, THIS WAS THE MODEL OF THE QORA PROJECT] crowetic
Line 1: Line 1:
 ====== QORA Original Data Hosting Model ====== ====== QORA Original Data Hosting Model ======
 {{:qora_logo.png?400|}} {{:qora_logo.png?400|}}
 +
 +=====THIS IS NOT THE MODEL QORTAL USES, THIS WAS THE MODEL OF THE QORA PROJECT=====
 +
 +This page is here to explain WHY the QORA model was deemed unworthy and REPLACED by the [[qortal_data_network_qdn|Qortal Data Network model]]. 
 +
  
 QORA had a model that was based on uploading data to the chain itself. In order to place data upon the QORA hosting, a user would have to register a name to use as a 'domain name' within QORA, then, utilizing transactions, upload data TO THE CHAIN. This data then was referenced by the registername, and was able to pull up HTML/js hosted within the blockchain. QORA had a model that was based on uploading data to the chain itself. In order to place data upon the QORA hosting, a user would have to register a name to use as a 'domain name' within QORA, then, utilizing transactions, upload data TO THE CHAIN. This data then was referenced by the registername, and was able to pull up HTML/js hosted within the blockchain.
Line 24: Line 29:
 This is good in theory, but bad in practice, when dealing with data actually on the blockchain. As when the system ends up getting a lot of users, the data would quickly become too large for the computers of the users to hold... making it eventually inevitable that the system would need a total rework once the data got to a point that it was filling the largest hard drives itself... So the long-term potential of this model is lacking. This is good in theory, but bad in practice, when dealing with data actually on the blockchain. As when the system ends up getting a lot of users, the data would quickly become too large for the computers of the users to hold... making it eventually inevitable that the system would need a total rework once the data got to a point that it was filling the largest hard drives itself... So the long-term potential of this model is lacking.
  
-The bloat, is the main issue that Qortal didn't use the on-chain storage model.+The bloat, is the main issue that Qortal didn't use the on-chain storage model. However, there is also the issue that no matter which user uploaded data, due to the QORA data model, EVERY user would have that data ON THEIR COMPUTER. This made it so that if there was 'unsavory' or even 'illegal' data uploaded, that data would then be on every user's node. Obviously, this isn't something that would play out well in the long term.
  
 ===Issue #2 - Data Uploads In Transactions (of a limited size, and lack of proper coding for data uploads)=== ===Issue #2 - Data Uploads In Transactions (of a limited size, and lack of proper coding for data uploads)===
qora_original_data_hosting_model.1629141704.txt.gz · Last modified: 08/16/2021 15:21 by gfactor

Page Tools